Tom Curry, msnbc.com, February 5th, 2008
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22978049
Obama’s coalition
Obama’s South Carolina victory and his second-place finish in New Hampshire made clear that he has drawn most of his support from a coalition of highly educated, affluent professionals, young voters, and African-Americans.
If Obama can assemble that same winning coalition in Connecticut, he is likely to do it again in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and other states that vote after this week.
And Tuesday’s outcome in Connecticut is likely to be broadcast even as voters in Arizona, California and other western states are still casting their ballots.
A big victory in Connecticut could ripple 3,000 miles to the Pacific Coast on Tuesday.
The prototype for how Obama could win Connecticut on Tuesday? The 2006 Senate primary.
The Establishment candidate was Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Democratic Party’s 2000 vice presidential nominee; the insurgent was Ned Lamont, a mostly self-financed antiwar candidate. Lamont won the primary with 52 percent of the vote.
In Tuesday’s primary Clinton is playing the Establishment favorite; Obama is taking Lamont’s role as the insurgent.
Lamont sees parallel with 2006 victory
Lamont, who is co-chair of Obama’s Connecticut campaign, sees the similarities between his win in August 2006 and Obama’s campaign: “Same grassroots/netroots energy and support. Barack is doing better with institutional support — party brass and unions — than I did in the primary.”
He added that, “seniors tend to lean towards the incumbent; I was crushed by age 60 and older voters and most of them see Hillary as the incumbent, so Barack may need more time to make that sale.”
Lamont added that Obama “will do great with younger voters, ethnic voters, and better educated voters which helped me win the primary. The emphasis is making sure they vote; we know that seniors vote.”
Clinton supporter Richard Blumenthal, the state’s attorney general, who attended Monday’s event in New Haven, rejected the idea that the Lamont 2006 prototype is the model for an Obama victory Tuesday.
“There’s no comparison,” he said. “Lamont-Lieberman was about the war; it was not just a difference in style or personality. It was a really stark difference on a predominant issue. This one is totally different. I think this is really about experience and qualifications, and about the economy.”
Lamont’s victory hinged on these cities and towns, places where Obama’s chances of success will be decided as well on Tuesday:
Full article at: